tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post967444471400570080..comments2024-03-16T05:00:38.826-04:00Comments on Egnorance: Gosnell's blundersmregnorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-75363393343559462262013-06-26T09:05:14.167-04:002013-06-26T09:05:14.167-04:00The real issue here is that the 'survivors'...The real issue here is that the 'survivors' in question are victims of attempted homicides. Legal, clinical, and totally evil homicides. To address that is to expose the abortion industry for what it is. <br />This is why these people are largely ignored. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14739783974158130525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-72891618691387551942013-06-25T21:36:10.113-04:002013-06-25T21:36:10.113-04:00The Torch,
No, I wasn't an abortionist. I wa...The Torch,<br /><br />No, I wasn't an abortionist. I was a pathologist. I reported on the tissues taken from patients by clinicians. If I reported on a biopsy taken by a neurosurgeon, that wouldn't make me a neurosurgeon.<br /><br />I learnt my limitations early and went into a para-clinical specialty.<br /><br />Off topic: does anyone know the episode or series of 'Scrubs' in which one of the doctors was followed by the ghost of a patient he'd just killed through negligence on his ward rounds? I gather it might have been the pathologist because he became a skilled coroner, able to recognise cases of medical negligence at a glance, having caused much the same ones himself when he was a clinician... I want to see if I can get the episode.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-30485768734558448812013-06-25T20:14:31.818-04:002013-06-25T20:14:31.818-04:00Thanks to all for pointing out the error about the...Thanks to all for pointing out the error about the number of abortion survivors as per the article. I've corrected it in the post. mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-72903172967629025892013-06-25T19:49:16.739-04:002013-06-25T19:49:16.739-04:00So you're an abortionist?
The TorchSo you're an abortionist?<br /><br />The TorchAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-45245158374852571162013-06-25T19:34:41.676-04:002013-06-25T19:34:41.676-04:00Egnor getting the number of survivors of failed ab...Egnor getting the number of survivors of failed abortion in America confused with the number of survivors of abortion in America each year is important. It's an indication of failure to attend to the exact details, which is expected in a professional such as a neurosurgeon. Operating on the wrong side of the brain isn't just a minor detail.<br /><br />As a pathologist, the only time I was sued was because of a failed abortion. The registrar (your version of a resident) did a very timid D & C (virtually just a chorionic villus sampling) and I reported it as 'products of conception confirmed' (surgeons don't always submit all the tissue obtained).<br /><br />And then 7 months later... The case was still being litigated 17 years later, when I'd retired. And to my annoyance. It should have been settled years earlier. What's worse than a mother telling her son for 17 years that he wasn't wanted in the first place.<br /><br />The experience certainly made me change my practice. I look for foetal tissue, an if I don't find any, and the amount of products is inadequate, query an incomplete abortion and suggest a pregnancy test in a week or two.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-33166031279692407272013-06-25T19:26:07.787-04:002013-06-25T19:26:07.787-04:00Exactly, Ben. The survivors are simply killed. The...Exactly, Ben. The survivors are simply killed. The ghouls who perform these murders are counting the money, not the mistakes.Adm. G Boggs, Glenbeckistan Navynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-16545106430374451582013-06-25T17:31:52.262-04:002013-06-25T17:31:52.262-04:00Keep in mind that the Kermit Gosnells of this worl...Keep in mind that the Kermit Gosnells of this world aren't documenting their survival rate. They're just flushing baby parts down the toilet and pretending the child never existed in the first place. <br /><br />There are however survivors. That's why we talk in terms of fetal viability. Viable fetuses can survive outside the womb, nonviable fetuses cannot. It's important to note that both are alive. That which is not alive cannot die, thus the question of survival is meaningless, since survive means to go on living. <br /><br />Now that we've established the existence of survivors, can we please dispense with the nonsensical talking point that pro-lifers are just obsessed with controlling women's uteri? We're merely opposed to murder. What's controversial about that? <br /><br />BenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-35273267151590169602013-06-25T17:26:45.685-04:002013-06-25T17:26:45.685-04:00Even the word "survive" is a bit hard to...Even the word "survive" is a bit hard to define. Most children who survive their abortions are then killed on the table right there. See Gosnell, Kermit. So does survive mean surviving only the attempt on the child's life inside the womb, or the subsequent attempt on the child's life outside the womb? Though morally indistinguishable, there are legal differences, from state to state. <br /><br />BenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-91553722211638501232013-06-25T17:10:38.551-04:002013-06-25T17:10:38.551-04:00Just to clarify the sense of my question, I was in...Just to clarify the sense of my question, I was indirectly referring to this:<br /><br /><i>[I]f there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try...</i><br />--- President Lackwit<br /><br />Adm. G Boggs, Glenbeckistan Navynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-71134334674190026262013-06-25T17:06:28.436-04:002013-06-25T17:06:28.436-04:00So... what if it's just one?
But we certainl...So... what if it's just one? <br /><br />But we certainly know the figure is much higher than one, using nothing but the Gosnell Abattoir as a basis.<br /><br />And if it's not a big deal, why did State Senator Obama vote 4 times against a measure that would prevent the murder of these children? Adm. G Boggs, Glenbeckistan Navynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-85582243787864870012013-06-25T15:50:09.126-04:002013-06-25T15:50:09.126-04:00about America's three thousand children who su...<i>about America's three thousand children who survive abortion each year</i><br /><br />Found the problem. Egnor can't read. The article he cited doesn't say three thousand per year. It says three thousand total. The actual annual figure is about seventy-five per year, and that's an estimate that appears to be based on nothing at all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-18733302557613110222013-06-25T15:47:46.432-04:002013-06-25T15:47:46.432-04:00I'd be interested to see the source of the fig...I'd be interested to see the source of the figure, given that it is more or less implausible. If true, it would mean that about one fifth of the post twenty week abortions result in a living child.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-2773976436051669192013-06-25T09:30:52.844-04:002013-06-25T09:30:52.844-04:00Three thousand abortion survivors a year. Somethin...Three thousand abortion survivors a year. Something tells me that the journalistic establishment would be interviewing these people on a regular basis if they weren't hopelessly biased. I just wish we could interview those who didn't survive, but alas, dead babies, like dead men, don't talk.<br /><br />The TorchAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-75487680572342181352013-06-25T07:47:54.084-04:002013-06-25T07:47:54.084-04:00They magically become "alive" when the m...They magically become "alive" when the mother decides she wants them. Nobody really understands how that works. It's probably a quantum effect. Or some weird thing with dark energy. Or intelligent DNA animating meat machines.<br /><br />Don't question it. Serious people have decided it's above our pay grade, Trish.Adm. G Boggs, Glenbeckistan Navynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-63195268570758367162013-06-25T07:43:54.782-04:002013-06-25T07:43:54.782-04:00Melissa's video is here. It's very powerfu...Melissa's video is <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwFIEprF_9Y" rel="nofollow">here</a>. It's very powerful.<br />Adm. G Boggs, Glenbeckistan Navynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-76090879056001933742013-06-25T07:35:17.902-04:002013-06-25T07:35:17.902-04:00Wiat, there are abortion survivors? I thought they...Wiat, there are abortion survivors? I thought they weren't alive in the first place.<br /><br />There are abortion survivors and abortion non-survivors, but there are no meaningless globs of tissues. <br /><br />TRISH Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com