tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post218725187389471723..comments2024-03-16T05:00:38.826-04:00Comments on Egnorance: Climategate 2.0mregnorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comBlogger39125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-38515211359658035732011-12-01T19:19:19.034-05:002011-12-01T19:19:19.034-05:00@troy
What about this?
Suits you very well!@troy<br /><br />What about <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/302357/paint_corner.jpg" rel="nofollow">this</a>?<br /><br />Suits you very well!Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-10831961888878707482011-12-01T19:11:43.208-05:002011-12-01T19:11:43.208-05:00Pepe: I think not.
We know. But don't give ...Pepe: I think not. <br /><br />We know. But don't give up trying!troyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05136662027396943138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-26702876537060035582011-12-01T18:03:10.603-05:002011-12-01T18:03:10.603-05:00@KW
“when I jam it in your @$$?”
Do you know what ...@KW<br /><i>“when I jam it in your @$$?”</i><br />Do you know what a metaphore is?<br />I think not...Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-58903450143470237402011-11-30T06:27:36.068-05:002011-11-30T06:27:36.068-05:00Is this when the fulfilled atheist says 'Shit ...<i>Is this when the fulfilled atheist says 'Shit happens'?</i><br /><br />The only people here who say "shit happens" are Egnor and his pals.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-40948883194441749072011-11-29T18:41:48.636-05:002011-11-29T18:41:48.636-05:00Ontario, Canada Anon.Ontario, Canada Anon.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14739783974158130525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-4516235762411118322011-11-29T18:40:58.245-05:002011-11-29T18:40:58.245-05:00Crusader said
"We defend our people here.
Al...Crusader said<br />"We defend our people here. <br />All of them"<br />Where is here, Crusader?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-9657286717720081032011-11-29T18:38:54.883-05:002011-11-29T18:38:54.883-05:00troy - boy ROFL
funny stuff, Crustroy - boy ROFL<br />funny stuff, CrusAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-4285360463776122772011-11-29T18:35:36.908-05:002011-11-29T18:35:36.908-05:00Troy-boy wrote:
"You must not overcompensate ...Troy-boy wrote:<br />"You must not overcompensate for having a small dick."<br />That's it? That's all you've got? A dick joke? Poor kid. You must be up against a wall. <br />I suppose I am expected to respond with a line about your mother or sister's satisfaction with my 'dick'? Or maybe about how YOU seem to think it's big enough when I jam it in your @$$? <br />Would that remind you of your science class snort sessions, or the pot fuelled debates in the quad? <br />Jesus,kid. Grow up.<br />No dicks involved. Just balls. <br />Any attempt to enforce population controls, eugenics, or social engineering here will be met with violent force and fierce political resistance. I hope you can say the same about your region and military. <br />We defend our people here. <br />All of them.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14739783974158130525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-41076524430292516352011-11-29T18:24:21.135-05:002011-11-29T18:24:21.135-05:00"...Our comments are merely a tribute to Egno..."...Our comments are merely a tribute to Egnorance."<br />Gas on the fire, Oleg? LOL<br />I don't think I could even see your comments the first time I posted. My beef was / with the pathetic attempt to assert a religious or doomsday cult reasoning behind AGW scepticism. <br />The debate is a scientific one, not one of philosophy or theology. <br />I do not agree with you or Bach position, but I can see the argument. I appreciate that aspect, even if I oppose the position. <br />I do not appreciate the demonizing and bigoted comments in regards to the personal religious faith of the Doctor. In fact, I find such tactic lazy and cowardly.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14739783974158130525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-36506774325307561072011-11-29T18:12:36.175-05:002011-11-29T18:12:36.175-05:00Troy,
I will answer the kiddy questions for fun.
...Troy,<br />I will answer the kiddy questions for fun.<br /><br />"Do you think that God will come to the rescue when the going gets tough?"<br />Do you think 'science' will? How did the going get tough in the first place? 'PROGRESS' maybe?<br />To answer your extremely childish question: NO. <br />I think God loves those who help themselves. In the simplest terms possible -just for you, Troy - I think it is God's will that we adapt to nature, not force nature to adapt to us. That does not mean killing our young or building space balloons to reflect the sun. It means learning to live as men and women - NOT machines. <br /><br />"Do you eagerly await the apocalypse?"<br />No. I do not eagerly await the end of time and the fall of man. It will come in it's course and when the Creator wills it. I find no need to rush that along. Do you pray for the big crunch or the great disentanglement? Is your fascination with doomsday scenarios somehow related to your beliefs?<br /><br />"Do you think it's all a communist conspiracy to control the world?"<br />I am not sure what you mean by "it's". What is 'it is'?<br />As for the communists having a global agenda: The communists sure seem to think so. You may want to read some of their literature! The idea is called 'Internationalism' - BY the communists. <br />'Workers of the WORLD unite.." or something like that. <br />They even have a 'hymn'. <br />Myself? I think they like to imagine such scenarios, but it is very unlikely to ever be more anything more than a contingency. I hope so, anyway. <br /><br />"What the fuck?"<br />Hmmmm. <br />Is this when the fulfilled atheist says 'Shit happens'?<br /><br />"As I see it, the people that are worried about global warming and unchecked population growth are worried about the well-being of the people on earth."<br />Two words: Infantile. Naive. <br />If some sick bastard wants to breed and cull populations of creatures, let them get a rabbit hutch or an aquarium to satiate the twisted urges. <br />Try it with my family, in my country, or on my watch and they will get a first hand lesson in population control and a first class ticket to judgement day. <br /> <br />Bach,<br />"I suspect the ones blasé about climate change and overpopulation are looking forward with anticipation to the 'Apocalypse'."<br />Sure... because anyone who questions the judgement of 'science' (PBUH) is OBVIOUSLY a lunatic who dreams of the end of days. Please! <br />How about the ones who are not excited about AGW (the A is the issue) just don't like being LIED to and seeing data manipulated to cause PANIC in order to line pockets. How about THAT as an alternative to your doomsday cult. <br /><br />FFS People.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14739783974158130525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-47035048205860835232011-11-29T18:10:58.619-05:002011-11-29T18:10:58.619-05:00ID is junk science.
Believers of ID can argue all...ID is junk science.<br /><br />Believers of ID can argue all they want. More and more people don't believe this blatant lie!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-50559029478696884812011-11-29T18:09:55.435-05:002011-11-29T18:09:55.435-05:00@troy
In the white corner: ...Egnor, Pepe and Cru...@troy<br /><br />In the white corner: <i>...Egnor, Pepe and Crusador...</i><br /><br />In the back corner: bachfiend, troy and a lot of anonymouses.<br /><br />This fight is unjust. Too much brain power in the white corner!Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-86849264330743581272011-11-29T18:00:32.158-05:002011-11-29T18:00:32.158-05:00Here is the link to junk science.Here is the link to <a href="http://junkscience.com/2011/11/03/greenhouse-advocates-cant-see-the-obvious/" rel="nofollow">junk science</a>.Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-91237195078183780572011-11-29T17:57:54.142-05:002011-11-29T17:57:54.142-05:00AGW is junk science.
Believers of AGW can argue a...AGW is <a rel="nofollow">junk science.</a><br /><br />Believers of AGW can argue all they want. More and more people don't believe this blatant lie!Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-20465991081984299492011-11-29T17:09:40.962-05:002011-11-29T17:09:40.962-05:00Troy,
Or as Michael Crichton put it in 'Juras...Troy,<br /><br />Or as Michael Crichton put it in 'Jurassic Park', environmentalists aren't worried about the fate of the Earth. It can look after itself, and there's nothing that humans can do that will destroy the Earth and all the life on it. Environmentalists are worried about humans. Even if we don't send ourselves extinct, living through a climatic crisis isn't pleasant. 'May you live in interesting times' is a Chinese curse, not a wish of future well-being.<br /><br />I suspect the ones blasé about climate change and overpopulation are looking forward with anticipation to the 'Apocalypse'.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-21289652982617538032011-11-29T16:59:46.327-05:002011-11-29T16:59:46.327-05:00I honestly wonder why guys like Egnor, Pepe and Cr...I honestly wonder why guys like Egnor, Pepe and Crusador think it's a good idea to maximize the number of people on earth and to downplay the damage we do to the environment. <br /><br />Do you think that God will come to the rescue when the going gets tough?<br /><br />Do you eagerly await the apocalypse?<br /><br />Do you think it's all a communist conspiracy to control the world?<br /><br />What the fuck?<br /><br />As I see it, the people that are worried about global warming and unchecked population growth are worried about the well-being of the people on earth.troyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05136662027396943138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-49745865420187553172011-11-29T16:10:47.914-05:002011-11-29T16:10:47.914-05:00Oleg,
I'd more or less assumed that when Happ...Oleg,<br /><br />I'd more or less assumed that when Happer referred to 50 MYA he actually meant 55 MYA, the time of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, due to a massive out gassing of oceanic methane deposits (which leads to increased CO2 levels) associated with an oceanic mass extinction.<br /><br />Of course, during a climatic catastrophe, your species might survive, but you won't. Humans went through a population bottleneck 70-75,000 years ago with the eruption of a supervolcano in Sumutra, we're reduced to a few thousand couples and almost went extinct.<br /><br />William Happer's reasoning is suspect in other ways. He asserts that plants do badly at a CO2 level of 150 ppmv. Submariners can survive a CO2 level of 8,000 ppmv. Therefore humans can survive a global CO2 level in the thousands ...<br /><br />The wonder of that reasoning is amazing. Happer is apparently unable to distinguish the difference between toxic and greenhouse effects of a gas. Or he does, and has such contempt for people such as Pepe that he's willing to produce such spurious arguments.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-38614281927093240112011-11-29T14:19:47.225-05:002011-11-29T14:19:47.225-05:00crus,
our gracious host, by his own admission, ha...crus,<br /><br />our gracious host, by his own admission, has no idea what is in the emails, yet he sees fit to condemn the scientists. This is his typical combination of ignorance and arrogance that we have come to know and love. Our comments are merely a tribute to Egnorance.oleghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11644793385433232819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-83892453552167431612011-11-29T13:58:05.512-05:002011-11-29T13:58:05.512-05:00Fascinating.
A neurosurgeon makes a post on his b...Fascinating. <br />A neurosurgeon makes a post on his blog about newly released (and damning) correspondences that further expose the data-rigging of certain mainstream proponents of AGW... and...the response?<br />Scepticism of pop-science compared to flat-earth / round earth Lilliputian style debates. <br />NEWSFLASH: The Earth is actually at least and observably 4 dimensional - not 'flat' or 'round'. <br />Apparently, to question AGW is to be a barbarian! Or worse - a lunatic! To question AGW is compared to being a 'truther' , a deluded person who thinks the US is behind the 9/11 attacks on HERSELF! <br />Then just to prove the 'science', who could forgo comparing the Christian Host to cannibalism?<br />positivism once again shows it's intolerant stripes.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14739783974158130525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-13189538417830574502011-11-29T11:50:57.880-05:002011-11-29T11:50:57.880-05:00Pépé:
Backward is calling names again.
Well, wha...Pépé:<br /><br /><i>Backward is calling names again.</i><br /><br />Well, what do you suggest? You're insensitive to rational arguments.Jimmy Derpingtonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-1934372850408994382011-11-29T08:18:03.717-05:002011-11-29T08:18:03.717-05:00Oops! Here is the CO2 chart.Oops! Here is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phanerozoic_Carbon_Dioxide.png" rel="nofollow">CO2 chart</a>.oleghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11644793385433232819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-57133665566813349792011-11-29T08:16:56.188-05:002011-11-29T08:16:56.188-05:00Let's take Will Happer's argument and exam...Let's take Will Happer's <a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/05/the-truth-about-greenhouse-gases" rel="nofollow">argument</a> and examine it: <br /><br /><i>Before the industrial period, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere was 270 ppm. At the present time, the concentration is about 390 ppm, 0.039 percent of all atmospheric molecules and less than 1 percent of that in our breath. About fifty million years ago, a brief moment in the long history of life on earth, geological evidence indicates, CO2 levels were several thousand ppm, much higher than now. And life flourished abundantly.</i> <br /><br />Here is a chart showing CO2 levels on the scale of a billion years. From it, one can see that Happer is mistaken: carbon dioxide levels were above 1000 ppm not 50 million years ago but somewhat earlier, 100-200 MYA, during Cretaceous. Life was indeed abundant back then. <br /><br />What else was going on at the time? Well, there were no ice caps at the poles. And the sea levels were 170 meters higher than today. Surprise! That's precisely why we worry about high CO2 levels in the atmosphere. <br /><br />I am sure Happer understands that. Whether his followers do, I am not so sure.oleghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11644793385433232819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-63744669722013182502011-11-29T07:40:15.468-05:002011-11-29T07:40:15.468-05:00Backward is calling names again. He says he's ...Backward is calling names again. He says he's an ape and I agree. He really has problems accepting the TRUTH and that infuriates him. He's stuck on CO2!Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-2651426931042630312011-11-28T19:25:47.320-05:002011-11-28T19:25:47.320-05:00Pepe,
You're still an idiot.
I predicted tha...Pepe,<br /><br />You're still an idiot.<br /><br />I predicted that you would quote William Happer.<br /><br />Even I'd agree with his statement; 'There is evidence that Californian orange groves are about 30% more productive ...'. Some evidence? Slight evidence? Minimal evidence?<br /><br />30% over 150 years isn't much. Happer ascribes it to the increase in CO2. Has he considered other factors? The variety of orange grown? Fertilizers? Insecticides? Different irrigation methods? Netting to prevent birds damaging the crop? Just putting in more trees, because more modern transport the orchard it's are limited to selling the fruit in just the immediate are?<br /><br />I was intrigued by the claim, so I did a google search. All the hits were either to Happer making the same claim on other sites or other bloggers linking to his original claim. Happer doesn't cite a reference, ever.<br /><br />You're right. We do waste food. I suggested to you earlier that we could feed more if we weren't sqweemish and were willing to eat insects. Grasshoppers and locusts are very nutritious. Are you willing.<br /><br />Moron.<br /><br />Also, we aren't descended from apes. We are apes. We have evolved to be apes with large brains. It's a pity you didn't get yours, you idiot.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-14765598869139737502011-11-28T18:50:25.746-05:002011-11-28T18:50:25.746-05:00@backward
...you can't calculate. We are barel...@backward<br /><i>...you can't calculate. We are barely feeding 7 billion now, so if the crops are 50% more productive, we'd be barely feeding 10.5 billion humans, not feeding 14 billion, you moron.</i><br /><br />You should take into account that more than 50% of all the worldwide food production is wasted by overfed and overweight developed country inhabitants (more in the <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/302357/america-fat-gluttony.jpg" rel="nofollow">USA</a>) that eat like <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/302357/fat-girls-and-fries.jpg" rel="nofollow">pigs</a>!Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.com