tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post2576652847713661536..comments2024-03-16T05:00:38.826-04:00Comments on Egnorance: Progressive eugenicsmregnorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-30677053389773051352012-10-30T18:49:40.119-04:002012-10-30T18:49:40.119-04:00crusadeREX- you really shouldn't be trying to ...crusadeREX- you really shouldn't be trying to lecture other people about logic. In the first place, both you and Mr. Egnor are committing the logical fallacy of appeal to consequences. Evolution is a natural process. Saying a natural process is to blame for the efforts of some human beings to alter that process is like blaming the existence of atoms for the H Bomb. In the second place, your appeal to consequences is still a bad argument. The problem with eugenicists, aside from being evil, is that they don't really understand how evolution works. Narrowing the gene pool to artifically select for a couple of traits that breeders happen to find desirable tends to result in species becoming less fit over time, not more. Look at all the different animals we human beings have adapted to our needs- most of them couldn't survive a month in the wild. Purebred dogs are generally less healthy than mixed breeds and many experts think they won't be around too much longer. <br /><br />Eugenics is animal breeding applied to humans. If we apply your own "logic" above, we must conclude that you don't believe in animal breeding, since one must buy into breeding to think Eugenics could even WORK. So how about it crusadeREX, is animal breeding fake?<br /><br />Of course, it's also fascinating that you creationists are now rejecting even microevolution. You do realize you're doing that, right?<br /><br />BooAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-49282039621103152622012-10-30T12:03:32.396-04:002012-10-30T12:03:32.396-04:00And you smell like poo poo. And you smell like poo poo. Anony mouse mannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-57074488270272837052012-10-30T12:01:09.230-04:002012-10-30T12:01:09.230-04:00Poor anon seems unable to determine the theory of ...Poor anon seems unable to determine the theory of evolution from the evolutionist. He does not seem to understand that in order to believe that evolution's work may be sped up and perfected one must believe in EVOLUTION as the guiding force of man's existence. <br />You have to buy into natural selection to think Eugenics could even WORK, let alone the moral (nihilistic) implications. <br />Logic fail? <br />You would not know logic if it walked up and bit you in the face, Anon. That is evident by your attempt to reason away perfectly logical connections between the science and the social consequences. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14739783974158130525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-80828288264544887822012-10-30T06:17:59.541-04:002012-10-30T06:17:59.541-04:00Evolution is fueled by genetic diversity. Eugenics...Evolution is fueled by genetic diversity. Eugenics seeks to narrow the gene pool. Logic fail, Mr. Egnor.<br /><br />BooAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-89558978176782455652012-10-29T08:09:23.092-04:002012-10-29T08:09:23.092-04:00In an effort to lighten the day of those folks who...In an effort to lighten the day of those folks who aren't Mom's basement lap slappers (i.e., Progressives), here's <b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r9qFXcu9oM" rel="nofollow">a link</a></b> proving that a leftist video ("Rengineering Humans"; 3:36) is worth 1000 bellylaughs. It's representative of a New Nexus: climate change and eugenics.<br /><br />But it's not the Bad Eugenics. It's the New 21st Century Eugenics that relies only on... get this... Free Will!George Boggsnoreply@blogger.com