tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post5029840416128368055..comments2024-03-16T05:00:38.826-04:00Comments on Egnorance: Oopsmregnorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-37816536384207893042013-10-02T18:49:24.349-04:002013-10-02T18:49:24.349-04:00Michael,
Well, it's certainly settled that yo...Michael,<br /><br />Well, it's certainly settled that you're stupid. It's not science, although someone who is stupid enough to think that teleological evolution is a reasonable theory would be stupid enough to include all sorts of nonsense as science.<br /><br />And not be able to recognise science when he sees it.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-39968774082750212662013-10-02T18:46:17.813-04:002013-10-02T18:46:17.813-04:00Anonymous,
And your point, idiot?
I have occasio...Anonymous,<br /><br />And your point, idiot?<br /><br />I have occasionally posted regarding homosexuality, mainly to note that even if homosexuality is 'innate', not acquired, then that doesn't mean that there's a 'gay gene'.<br /><br />I've noted that the concordance rate of homosexuality in identical twins is around 20%, not nearly 100% as it should be if there was a strong genetic component.<br /><br />Homosexuality could be innate, but related to intrauterine development or very early childhood. Not a deliberate decision at the time of puberty.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-33254333272965828692013-10-02T18:31:15.164-04:002013-10-02T18:31:15.164-04:00fiend
Your absence in the gay topics is notable.fiend<br /><br />Your absence in the gay topics is notable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-66070805269418878462013-10-02T16:36:13.537-04:002013-10-02T16:36:13.537-04:00There was a question about my stupidity? I thought...There was a question about my stupidity? I thought that was settled science. mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-20141781517081479822013-10-02T15:44:50.681-04:002013-10-02T15:44:50.681-04:00Michael,
It raises even greater questions concern...Michael,<br /><br />It raises even greater questions concerning your stupidity, gullibility and propensity to believe in conspiracy theories without the slightest evidence.<br /><br />You're not particularly intelligent, are you? You keep on confirming the comments of a physician I once had as a tutor at university many decades ago who noted that surgeons are good with their hands, but not particularly intelligent.<br /><br />Surgeons are just technicians, not scientists. The scientific method and logic aren't their strong points.bachfiendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14752055891882312204noreply@blogger.com