tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post9158802089663868917..comments2024-03-16T05:00:38.826-04:00Comments on Egnorance: What Judge David L. Bunning got wrong mregnorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-23008882136180415122015-09-12T01:00:14.941-04:002015-09-12T01:00:14.941-04:00I am looking forward to the fall of Bunning he mus...I am looking forward to the fall of Bunning he must pay for jailing people for not signing marriage certificates. He misused his power and the closet Bunny rabbit will pay . Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-12838882285863509212015-09-11T05:13:45.703-04:002015-09-11T05:13:45.703-04:00Remove Judge Bunning from the bench!!! He said he ...Remove Judge Bunning from the bench!!! He said he was religious. So why did he jail his sister in Christ? He would have to answer to Him at the time of the judgment seat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-84335976752498707892015-09-11T04:46:09.016-04:002015-09-11T04:46:09.016-04:00Bunning was appointed by bush around the time a ca...Bunning was appointed by bush around the time a campaign commercial aired featuring George W Bush and David Bunnings father, at the time a sitting us Senator Jim Bunning walking side by side. Just my opinion but talk about daddy buying his son a job with political favors. This should be illegal and I think it is illegal, it should at least be looked into. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-73802325930569197072015-09-08T19:17:53.402-04:002015-09-08T19:17:53.402-04:00William Spearshake, you wrong about marriage not b...William Spearshake, you wrong about marriage not being owned by any religion. the first marriage was in the Garden of Eden, when God himself created Eve the first women for the first Man Adam to be his wife, thus marriage is owned by God and Christianity. So before you spout off again and show everyone on this forum that you're not to smart read up first.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-20218833614757619152015-09-08T19:00:28.233-04:002015-09-08T19:00:28.233-04:00Bleeding liberal.Bleeding liberal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-4618375978305711812015-09-08T18:58:21.745-04:002015-09-08T18:58:21.745-04:00Your exactly right me112233 the so called Judge ha...Your exactly right me112233 the so called Judge has never been married and has ruled in the past in favor of the homosexual agenda trying to force students to view a video to make them feel that homosexual behavior is normal. Remove Judge bunning from the bench !!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-52952393303098168502015-09-08T15:54:47.540-04:002015-09-08T15:54:47.540-04:00John said:"She endorses marriage as represent...John said:"She endorses marriage as representing the state, not as Kim Davis representing Kim Davis." <br />ok, but she can't be A two "personality" person at a time!! she is what she is!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-12026567295552816032015-09-07T10:51:33.686-04:002015-09-07T10:51:33.686-04:00Unfortunately, it is cowards like you who would ha...Unfortunately, it is cowards like you who would have told the founding fathers to knock off all the "no king but King Jesus" nonsense, end the rebellion and do your job. You are beyond pathetic. Except for the crew the entire Mayflower group were religious protesters who were tired of the government telling them how to practice their faith. Most were Sabbatarian’s trying to escape England's Sunday only laws. Without religious courage, there would be no America as we know it and you wouldn't even be here. Your weak-kneed ignorance is stunning. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13551341121091655338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-20919943067711206092015-09-07T10:50:31.418-04:002015-09-07T10:50:31.418-04:00Unfortunately, it is cowards like you who would ha...Unfortunately, it is cowards like you who would have told the founding fathers to knock off all the "no king but King Jesus" nonsense, end the rebellion and do your job. You are beyond pathetic. Except for the crew the entire Mayflower group were religious protesters who were tired of the government telling them how to practice their faith. Most were Sabbatarian’s trying to escape England's Sunday only laws. Without religious courage, there would be no America as we know it and you wouldn't even be here. Your weak-kneed ignorance is stunning. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13551341121091655338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-64582891437526666692015-09-06T20:31:32.219-04:002015-09-06T20:31:32.219-04:00Got no problem with folks living their own way, j...Got no problem with folks living their own way, just quit tring to force me to see the world thru your eyes. After you loose your entire family to death, the understanding of life will be altered, showing you the other side and how very short it is. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-80843618396753176862015-09-06T18:48:26.486-04:002015-09-06T18:48:26.486-04:00CLJ:
Tatsächlich. Das Gewissen ist keinerlei Rech...CLJ:<br /><br />Tatsächlich. Das Gewissen ist keinerlei Rechtfertigung für die Missachtung einer gerichtlichen Anordnung. <br /><br />Auch wenn das Problem hätte leicht, indem Sie zu einem anderen Büro gelöst haben, Gehorsam gegenüber dem Staat ist das einzige, was zählt.<br /><br />Sie würden in Deutschland blühte haben.<br />mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-14720221690419202672015-09-06T18:16:52.116-04:002015-09-06T18:16:52.116-04:00The State of Kentucky may not have laws that viola...The State of Kentucky may not have laws that violate the Constitution of the United States of America, and the Supreme Court ruled that the law did exactly that. It does not matter how many people voted for it, the law is not permitted. The people of Kentucky now have two options: write a law that achieves their spurious goal without violating the principals of the Constitution, or convince enough people of this nation that we need to amend the Constitution in order to deny rights to some citizens.<br />Ms. Davis took an oath, and she violated it. She was given a court order, and she ignored it. Jail's the correct solution.<br />C.L.J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/01734352657431970430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-79827251596772896452015-09-06T00:11:03.529-04:002015-09-06T00:11:03.529-04:00How much wrong doing are we going to allow in the ...How much wrong doing are we going to allow in the name of the Lord? Invoking God's name doesn't make you right. And by the way, this issue was working it's way to the Supreme Court when Kim Davis last ran for re-election. So, she did know that she might be faced with this decision. Finally, your rights end as soon as they step on mine just as mine end when they step on yours. Kim should do her job or step down. SHE DID VIOLATE THE LAW! A court order is just that just as it is for all others ever found in contempt. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-26757304852405137762015-09-05T22:20:02.635-04:002015-09-05T22:20:02.635-04:00Good point, Ilion. She has no problem issuing lice...Good point, Ilion. She has no problem issuing licenses to homosexuals applying for heterosexual marriage. <br /><br />It's easy to fall into their terminology.mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-46542422660619429792015-09-05T22:08:28.394-04:002015-09-05T22:08:28.394-04:00M.Egnor: "And since she took no oath to "...<b>M.Egnor:</b> "<i>And since she took no oath to "enforce the whims of unelected lawyers who violate the Constitution", she is under no legal obligation to issue marriage licenses to homosexuals.</i>"<br /><br />Please, don't allow the leftists to set the terms to be used. It isn't that she isn't issuing marriage licenses to homosexuals -- she isn't even asking the applicants about their sexual preferences. Rather, she is not issuing the same marriage license to two men, or to two women, ragardless of their sexual preference.Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-5184969268921013992015-09-05T08:07:33.071-04:002015-09-05T08:07:33.071-04:00@Vanessa:
[are you insinuating that the governmen...@Vanessa:<br /><br />[are you insinuating that the government doesn't have a compelling interest in the right for all Americans to marry?]<br /><br />Getting married by Kim Davis isn't a compelling interest. They can go elsewhere. mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-35855682893093419602015-09-05T08:06:10.377-04:002015-09-05T08:06:10.377-04:00@John:
[She endorses marriage as representing the...@John:<br /><br />[She endorses marriage as representing the state,]<br /><br />The law of the State of Kentucky does not permit gay marriage. And since she took no oath to "enforce the whims of unelected lawyers who violate the Constitution", she is under no legal obligation to issue marriage licenses to homosexuals. mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-37666007589678956292015-09-05T08:02:16.949-04:002015-09-05T08:02:16.949-04:00me:
Fascinating point. I do think that the Gaysta...me:<br /><br />Fascinating point. I do think that the Gaystapo searches for fellow gaystapos in the judiciary so the fix is in. This certainly happened in the California ruling on Prop 8.<br /><br />Very interesting theory. mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-65613934725250300802015-09-05T06:37:37.646-04:002015-09-05T06:37:37.646-04:00To be fair, when she ran for office, the law of th...To be fair, when she ran for office, the law of the land was no gay marriages (unconstitutional in Kentucky). Then, five perverts in black robes claimed that Kentucky's constitution was unconstitutional (if that makes any sense). But she was already in office at that time.<br /><br />Curiously, you indirectly hit on something. The Circuit Clerk does not help prepare divorce papers; not in any way, shape, or form. The Circuit Clerk simply records the documents filed with the court system, and sometimes forwards a copy to the other party. In contrast, the County Clerk (a different office in Kentucky) must participate in the preparation of the marriage license, and must sign it to make it "good." The marriage license is NOT something that is prepared by someone else, and simply brought to the clerks office to make a record of it, similar to how a deed or mortgage is handled (the clerk simply records what was 100% done by someone else).me112233https://www.blogger.com/profile/08998066370664206853noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-59608966673573494272015-09-05T06:26:44.361-04:002015-09-05T06:26:44.361-04:00I think you missed the point. Imprisoning someone...I think you missed the point. Imprisoning someone for genuinely held religious beliefs is an extreme act, in and of itself, as we are all specifically granted "free exercise" under the US Constitution, and most state constitutions. The compelling interest asks the question "What harm is done to the state (government) with respect to the person's religious beliefs and/or refusal to do X based upon those beliefs." Obviously, the answer is very little. Is there an alternative way to get the job done beyond putting the woman in jail? Obviously, the answer is yes. Now ask yourself this question -- Why is the supposedly highly-successful judge never married? Is he a closeted homosexual, who took out his wrath upon Kim Davis?me112233https://www.blogger.com/profile/08998066370664206853noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-56588057565641272392015-09-05T06:11:28.741-04:002015-09-05T06:11:28.741-04:00Actually, issuing the license in Kentucky is not m...Actually, issuing the license in Kentucky is not merely an "administrative act." Unlike other duties of the County Clerk, the marriage license actually requires the Clerk to participate in the execution of the document. When you buy a property of get a mortgage, the clerk records the deed and mortgage, but the clerk doesn't help prepare the deed or mortgage, or in any way get involved in the execution of the documents, or even act as gate keeper to approve or disapprove of the transaction; the clerk merely records what happened. With a marriage license, the clerk must sign the license, and by doing so grants permission for marriage. One might ask why any government agency is involved "approving" marriages, but it is what it is. So, Kim Davis was put in a no-win position when five perverts in black robes decided that there had magically appeared somewhere in the US Constitution a "right" for same-sex couples to get married. me112233https://www.blogger.com/profile/08998066370664206853noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-88441198224662703542015-09-04T22:37:43.950-04:002015-09-04T22:37:43.950-04:00She endorses marriage as representing the state, n...She endorses marriage as representing the state, not as Kim Davis representing Kim Davis.Johnhttp://john.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-174030900832660492015-09-04T21:50:45.095-04:002015-09-04T21:50:45.095-04:00"So you're volunteering to pay the meager..."<i>So you're volunteering to pay the meager fines?"</i><br /><br />Why would I pay the fine for someone who intentionally broke the law? Are you going to pay my speeding fine because I disagree with the speed limit? I didn't think so. <br /><br />"<i>Gays have equal rights. Gay marriage is not a right, "</i><br /><br />The Supreme Court disagrees with you. <br /><br />Why are you so opposed to same sex marriage? Nobody is forcing the church to preside over a SSM. Marriage is as much a civil and secular institution as it is religious one. Marriage predates Christianity, and even during the Christian Era it has changed dramatically. It has done so even during my life. Not too long ago wife's had to vow to honour and <b>obey</b> their husbands. Not long ago husbands were legally allowed (and expected) to physically discipline their wives. So this concept of "traditional" marriage is an artificial concept. <br /><br />Again, please provide me with the rationale against allowing SSM. If you can do it without invoking the bible, I might listen to you. But you can't. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-73253880092436649232015-09-04T18:47:13.875-04:002015-09-04T18:47:13.875-04:00[Nobody has destroyed any bodies life over a cake]...[Nobody has destroyed any bodies life over a cake]<br /><br />So you're volunteering to pay the meager fines?<br /><br />[Today homosexuals are fighting for equal rights, supported by a large number of heterosexuals.]<br /><br />Gays have equal rights. Gay marriage is not a right, anymore than marrying your dog is a right. mregnorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431770851694587832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3555199390227912207.post-19046898074123634292015-09-04T18:32:56.029-04:002015-09-04T18:32:56.029-04:00Nobody has destroyed any bodies life over a cake (...Nobody has destroyed any bodies life over a cake (or photos, or flowered, or a marriage license). In all of those cases the people were refusing to provide a service to people based on sexual orientation, which is against the law. They made bad decisions. And in many cases, as with Ms. Davis, the court bent over backwards to arrive at a compromise that would prevent them from further negative consequences. They chose to play the martyr role. <br /><br />You have repeatedly said that the comparison to the civil rights movement is obscene. Why? At the time blacks fought for equal rights, supported by a large number of whites. Today homosexuals are fighting for equal rights, supported by a large number of heterosexuals. They are not fighting for special rights, just equal rights. Including marriage. Which, as much as you would disagree, is not owned by any religion. With right come responsibilities and obligations. One of those is to defend the rights of others, even if we don't understand, or even condone, their decisions. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.com