Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Sbarro and my Palestinian moment

The conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians is a microcosm of the worldwide struggle between Judeo-Christian civilization and Islam. Even before I was a Christian, I found the tactics employed by the Palestinians against the Israelis repulsive. Airline hijacking, suicide bombing, taking hostages, and attacks targeting Jewish civilians have long been the staple of Palestinian 'diplomacy'. Palestinian culture was infested with anti-Semitism. Even the public face of Palestinian culture was repulsive. Yasir Arafat was a transparently evil man.

But there was a moment of illumination when the Palestinian enterprise specifically, and the Islamic menace more generally, showed itself, in a way that made my blood run cold.

On August 9, 2001 a Palestinian suicide bomber detonated an explosive belt containing nails, nuts and bolts in a Sbarro's pizza restaurant in Jerusalem. It was crowded with families and children, which seemed to be the main reason it was chosen.

These are the dead; notice the ages and the families:

- Giora Balash, 60, of Brazil
- Zvika Golombek, 26, of Carmiel
- Shoshana Yehudit Greenbaum, 31, of the U.S.
- Tehila Maoz, 18, of Jerusalem
- Frieda Mendelsohn, 62, of Jerusalem
- Michal Raziel, 16, of Jerusalem
- Malka Roth, 15, of Jerusalem
- Mordechai Schijveschuurder, 43, of Neria
- Tzira Schijveschuurder, 41, of Neria
- Ra'aya Schijveschuurder, 14, of Neria
- Avraham Yitzhak Schijveschuurder, 4, of Neria
- Hemda Schijveschuurder, 2, of Neria
- Lily Shimashvili, 33, of Jerusalem
- Tamara Shimashvili, 8, of Jerusalem
- Yocheved Shoshan, 10, of Jerusalem



A family of five was murdered, among with ten other innocents, targeted for death merely because they were Jews.

But no, this bloodthirsty attack wasn't my Palestinian revelation. It was one of countless attacks on innocent Jews and others by Palestinian killers. Homicidal Islamic performance art.

This was my Palestinian revelation:


(From the Jewish Anti-Defamation League)

Palestinian Students Glorify Terrorism with Exhibit in Nablus


Palestinian students at Al Najah University walk under a replica of a Sbarro pizza restaurant sign, which reads "Kosher" in Hebrew
Palestinian students at al-Najah University in the city of Nablus marked the anniversary of the outbreak of Palestinian violence with an exhibition entitled "The Sbarro Cafe Exhibition," celebrating the August 9, 2001 suicide bombing of the Sbarro pizza restaurant in Jerusalem, which killed 15 people and wounded dozens more.

According to reports in the Israeli media and The Associated Press, the exhibition was comprised of a series of rooms. The Sbarro section of the exhibit was replete with body parts and pizza slices strewn across the room. The walls were painted red to represent spattered blood.

Another part of the exhibit glorified the "martyrs" who carry out suicide operations shown with a Koran and Kalishnikov in hand. A third section depicted a Palestinian behind a rock placed in front of a mannequin of an ultra-Orthodox Jew, with a taped recording broadcast on the loudspeakers saying "O believer, there is a Jewish man behind me. Come and kill him."
Note that al-Najah University isn't some terrorist store-front, a University of Phoenix for Nakba-fixated sociopaths. It's the leading university in the Palestinian Territory-- the Harvard of the West Bank. It educates the Palestinian elite. This hellish celebration of mass murder was put together by the savants of Palestinian culture. The Palestinian cognoscenti pulled out all the artistic stops. How to make the explosion fresh, how to draw the visitor into the celebration of Jewish carnage? The exhibit featured plastic severed Jewish limbs and flesh suspended by wires in the air, to simulate the exact moment of the explosion.

It was taken down, belatedly, at the direction of President Arafat (Palestinian Nobel Peace Laureate and father of airline hijacking) to assuage international outrage.

The exhibit was a searing indictment of Palestinian culture, and a searing indictment of Islam. The atrocity is not merely that some Palestinians kill, or that Islam condones killing, or that Islam condones killing of innocents, or that Islam condones killing Jews qua Jews. The atrocity is that Islam's elites revel in the murder of innocents. The evil is not merely that the Palestinian baby boom-- the suicidal sociopath rabble-- murders Jewish families. The evil is that the Islamic intelligentsia, the tenured Islamic educators, the revered Islamic visionaries celebrate-- celebrate-- the murder of Jews.

For the petroleum-greased Islamic propaganda machine, the al-Najah University Sbarro exhibit was a Freudian slip. A moment of startling clarity.

If you want to understand the moral rot in Islam, understand the Sbarro exhibit at al-Najah University.

Monday, May 7, 2012

George will on "after-birth abortions"

George Will, in an essay on a different topic, has an emphatic paragraph on the emerging concept on medical ethics of "after-birth abortion". I kid you not.

Controversies can be wonderfully clarified when people follow the logic of illogical premises to perverse conclusions. For example, two academics recently wrote in the British Journal of Medical Ethics that “after-birth abortions” — killing newborn babies — are matters of moral indifference because newborns, like fetuses, “do not have the same moral status as actual persons” and “the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant.” So killing them “should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.” This helpfully validates the right-to-life contention that the pro-abortion argument, which already defends third-trimester abortions, contains no standard for why the killing should be stopped by arbitrarily assigning moral significance to the moment of birth.

This is for real. Medical ethics is going to some very bad places-- I see it evolving in my practice.

A darkness is descending.

Peter Atkins vs William Lane Craig: Atkins should press charges for assault





Perhaps the most the most brilliant and devastating reduction of an argument that I have seen in a debate. Atkins says something really stupid-- that there is nothing that science can't explain-- and Craig rhetorically mutilates him. It was like a crime scene. I almost felt bad for Atkins. Watch his face as Craig replies.

You can see why atheists rely so heavily on censorship. Ignorance and arrogance are unattractive and remarkably ineffective-- and vulnerable-- when unscripted in public in real time in a fair forum.

New Atheists do poorly in debates. New Atheists do really poorly in debates with Bill Craig.

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Global warming is a consensus among environmental psychopaths



Heh.

Why Mike Bermudez is an atheist...

Mike Bermudez pens a guest post on Pharyngula on why he's an atheist. His post, with my commentary:

Why I’m An Atheist – Mike Bermudez


I perhaps had it easier than most. Actually, I’m quite sure I did. While my father took me to a Roman Catholic church when I was little- at least from the ages 7 to 10 -I never paid attention.
Unlike most young kids, who listen in rapt fascination to Mass.
Quite frankly at the latter stages, I was quite uncomfortable with the whole thing.
Unlike most kids, he fidgeted.
Bored out of my mind for one and having to dress up in cloths that I never cared to wear. In fact, one time I asked my dad if I could bring a book on dinosaurs to read. You know, in case I got bored.
I let my youngest read books on dinosaurs. It's hard to sit still for any reason for an hour when you're a kid. Unless you're playing video games...

I later figured that my father was doing this solely at the behest of my grandparents. I’m not sure why he stopped going and thus my not going, but it was quite nice. The nightly prayers stopped too- what a bore those were.
Mike's life is centered around evading boredom...

My mom on the other hand had become Buddhist or perhaps had been for some time- I’m not sure. She would take me to weekly meetings and would have me sit with her at our home alter. Not only was I already bored with religion in general, but now it’s in a different language. Oh joy.
Children should never be asked to participate in things that don't entertain them...

The weekly meetings were much more fun than the Catholic church.
Whew!
There were kids to play with, I could read whatever I brought with me, sometimes if it was held at someone’s house, they might have dogs for me to pet! Oh and I often had to do my homework. Never seemed to escape that. This too stopped being a common occurrence. Again I’m not too sure when, although I believe I was in the 6th grade. It was also around this time that I started to slowly learn about religion, but it wouldn’t be until High School that I really got into it.
Notice how nearly all "Why I'm an atheist" posts consist mainly of atheists telling us how boring church was to them when they were kids. P.Z. should expand his selection of posters beyond 12 year olds.

My “indoctrination” into mocking religion came in the form of “No-God.com”. If you’ve never been and wish for a 90s flash-back, I highly recommend it. This website had a great mix of humor and facts. Very dark and twisted humor. Perfect for a high school student engrossed in all things Metal and GWAR.

Mike put a lot of thought into his rejection of God. A "90's flashback" God-mocking website, Metal and GWAR. I'm waiting for Mike's views on Marilyn Manson's take on the cosmological argument and Jesus' atonement for our sins...

GWAR, along with Marilyn Manson, led to some new websites and interesting people/ideas.
Mike reasoned that any universe that spawned Marilyn Manson couldn't have been intelligently designed.
The “Church of the Sub Genius” is one of them as well as the “Church of Satan”.
Nice bit of candor there...
Satanism is just as boring to me as Christianity,
Satan bores Mike. I doubt that Mike bores Satan.
although at the time was certainly something fun to heat people up with in a hurry. Aside from cheesy websites and religions, I didn’t much pay attention to it all. In fact, I’m not sure I was too familiar with the term “Atheist” at the time.
It doesn't seem that Mike was familiar with anything except GWAR, Metal, and Satanism. Time to expand your horizons, Mike...
I believe my standard reply to the question of my religious affiliation was: “I don’t have time for any of that.”
Why do I have the feeling that Mike's problem with Christianity was that it told him that there were some things he shouldn't do?


After discovering Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and PZ Myers, it became quite clear to me that Atheism was here to stay in my life. Not only that, but it helped me gain confidence in what I believed in and a confidence to be open and expressive about it. I feel very free about life and much more excited about the natural beauty of the world because of it.

Mike Bermudez
Fnord
Mike's pablum is common in Myers' "Why I'm an atheist" series. A kid is bored to death by church or is exposed to fundamentalist views that are in conflict with accepted science. At that point, thinking seems to stop. The dejected tween declares himself a skeptic or atheist or whatever, and his mind closes like a trap, never coming to grips with the serious arguments for God's existence or with genuine encounter with God in prayer. Atheist fundamentalism is a good word for it, except that it is an insult to Christian fundamentalists, who are far more thoughtful and perceptive and who are right about the things that matter.

Myers of course fosters all of this callow atheism. You'll notice that his own arguments against God are merely the same arguments as the bored adolescents use.

New Atheism is intellectual degradation.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Iowahawk's "Julia's Circle of Life"



I love Iowahawk.

Only five reasons?

John Hawkins has a great post on "5 Reasons Liberals Are Such Unpleasant People To Be Around". Pretty much nails it.

Of course, on this blog we welcome liberals. Keeps the comments interesting. Continuous wisdom would be so monotonous.