Friday, July 1, 2011

You don't need to read the e-mails to know these scientists are nuts.

From the Guardian
Alien encounters 'within twenty years'
A top Russian astronomer say he expects humans to encounter extraterrestrial civilisations within the next two decades
Russian scientists expect humanity to encounter alien civilisations within the next two decades, a top Russian astronomer said on Monday.
"The genesis of life is as inevitable as the formation of atoms ... Life exists on other planets and we will find it within 20 years," said Andrei Finkelstein, director of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Applied Astronomy Institute, according to the Interfax news agency.
Speaking at an international forum dedicated to the search for extraterrestrial life, Finkelstein said 10% of the known planets circling suns in the galaxy resemble Earth.
If water can be found there, then so can life, he said, adding that aliens would most likely resemble humans with two arms, two legs and a head.
"They may have different colour skin, but even we have that," he said.
Finkelstein's institute runs a programme launched in the 1960s at the height of the cold war space race to watch for and beam out radio signals to outer space.
"The whole time we have been searching for extraterrestrial civilisations, we have mainly been waiting for messages from space and not the other way," he said.
In March a Nasa scientist caused controversy after claiming to have found tiny fossils of alien bugs inside meteorites that landed on Earth. 
Richard Hoover, an astrobiologist at the US space agency's Marshall space flight centre in Alabama, said filaments and other structures in rare meteorites appear to be microscopic fossils of extraterrestrial beings that resemble algae known as cyanobacteria.
Writing in the Journal of Cosmology, Hoover claimed that the lack of nitrogen in the samples, which is essential for life on Earth, indicated they are "the remains of extraterrestrial life forms that grew on the parent bodies of the meteorites when liquid water was present, long before the meteorites entered the Earth's atmosphere."
There's something bizarre afoot in science. Major 'breakthroughs' in evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology and Darwinian medicine are announced in magazines and newspapers. The 'discoveries' are usually hyped or ridiculous;  some publicity-seeking scientist seeking a few moments of fame with some loony hunch: the brain evolved because of a mutation in spit,  that missing link has finally been found, finally proving that the fact of evolution is a.. err.. fact,  malaria evolved as an aid to mosquito aviation, yada yada.

Climate scientists are mostly just on weekend furloughs from a locked ward.  The air we exhale will destroy the earth, the seas are rising, earthquakes are from  global warming, etc.

The funniest are perhaps the 'astrobiologists',  who warn us that the aliens are coming in 20 years, or 10 years, or.... soon!  They can't agree on whether our visitors will be green or blue, have 3 eyes or 10.  Will they be friendly or will they want to take us back to their home planet as exotic hors d'oeuvres. Stay tuned!

The science behind this junk is non-existent. We have no idea how life arose on earth (guesses don't count!), so how can we predict the existence of life elsewhere? An N of zero is a poor basis for statistical inference.

It's like some crazy religious cult.


  1. There's some pretty good science around the subject of abiogenesis. I suggest you hit the GOOGLE. It's not like we have 'no idea'. That sounds like a statement that would be made by someone in a crazy religious cult.


  2. Here's a question that has often made me wonder:
    Why are the Atheist / materialist set so intent on co-opting the humanoid 'alien' ...stuff.
    Why are they so determined to preempt any sort of contact with 'evolutionary' explanations.
    We see it increasing, as if to drown out Carl Sagan's (and many others) ideas that alien life, evolved on different worlds by random mutation / NS, would be .... well, utterly ALIEN; ie Nothing like us?
    Well, here is my two cents.
    After having read their essential von Däniken (they should have read Jacques Vallée), watched WAY too much Star Trek TNG and becoming convinced of a kind of 'scifi' reality, they found they had a big problem.
    You guessed it: DESIGN. How could Star Trek AND Sagan be right?
    Why would men (or microbes) from an entirely different and random genesis LOOK the same? Why would they have the same 'plan'? This problem is multiplied when the number of 'aliens' is increased. Little green men AND little grey men? Blonde Aryan types? Lizard men too?
    Well I can think of three explanations.
    1) They had the same designer.
    2) One designed the other (who designed them?)
    3) They are NOT aliens, but supernatural apparitions who are content to let us think they are 'extra terrestrials', fairies, and other such contemporary legends.

    For the atheist materialist set 1 and 3 are unacceptable - nigh impossible. They cannot be reconciled with dogma.
    So 2 becomes the mantra, but without that secondary question.
    I would LOVE to see their collective gasp when encountered by one of these beings it were to ask them about God, meaning, purpose or immortality. According to our myths and legends the 'sky people' sure do like to talk about that stuff a lot!
    nanu nanu,
    Live Long and Prosper,
    CrusadeRex out!

    Happy Canada Day!