Opinions and musings on religion, philosophy, science, politics, and life from a conservative Catholic neurosurgeon.
Because homosexuality totally causes cancer and "second-hand" homosexuality (being near homosexual people?) gives you AIDS.
Sodomy is a leading cause anal cancer. Also, the dangers of second hand smoke are bullshit. So your assessment is far off. For a guy named after a sexually transmitted disease, you aren't too astute about sexual matters. The Torch
- Some homosexual men don't have anal sex.- Some heterosexual couples have anal sex.- Homosexual women don't have anal sex.
Some homosexual men don't have anal sex. Really? I'd like to meet those. Some heterosexual couples do. Yeah, I know that. Homosexual women don't have anal sex? Apparently, you've never heard of strapons. I think you're trying to demonstrate that sodomy and homosexuality are unrelated. They're not. Homosexuality, and particularly male homosexuality, is fraught with health risks. It's damaging to the person who does it and it costs the taxpayer money in public health costs. Talking about it has become "bigotry". That means that we have to shut up or liberals call us mean names.The Torch
"Sodomy" and homosexuality are unrelated BECAUSE some heterosexual couples have anal and oral sex, as anal sex, oral sex or sexual activity between a person and a non-human animal bestiality, masturbation and other non-procreative sexual activities can be placed under the umbrella term of "sodomy", making sodomy related to sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and even heterosexuality and asexuality.Your point has just become insignificant.
Best post ever, Dr. Egnor. Yes, this is exactly how they think. TRISH
Hat Tip to Ilion and Liberal Logic 101.
What a surprise. Ilion with his 'stylish' mustachio has it in for the gayz. Self-hating homo alert!Would anyone be really surprised to hear if at some point it turned out that Egnor likes to fondle boys that are under narcosis? I for one wouldn't...
Ilion has a moustache, which means he's gay. Ilion commented on Egnor's blog, so that means Egnor's a homosexual pedophile. This is what passes for rational debate among liberals.Joey
Troy,"Would anyone be really surprised to hear if at some point it turned out that Egnor likes to fondle boys that are under narcosis? I for one wouldn't..."Yes. I would be surprised to hear about anyone I know being a sexual deviant with a taste for kids. Would you care to explain your obsession with child molestations, Troy? Why you constantly compare gay people with child molesters?
Joey, I didn't realize this thread was supposed to encourage rational debate. I mean, comparing homosexuality with cancer? What's to debate? Crusader:Yes. I would be surprised to hear about anyone I know being a sexual deviant with a taste for kids.I guess you don't know any priests then. Odds are pretty good children were abused in a Catholic church near you.
@CrusaderREX; There's a lot of overlapping between gays and child molesters. The Torch
"You want to make abortion legal [sic]? That don't make sense motherfucka. What we gonna have all these ugly ass nappy headed kids running around here hungry for?"http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Dnsq4Se4pBgObama voters are rational and informed. --Francisca S.
And here's another one of an Obama voter telling CNN he voted "a couple of times."http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Dnsq4Se4pBgCNN reporter: "I think that's against the law, but that's okay." No, it isn't okay. Francisca S.
Funny videos, Francisca S. Funny if they weren't true.Joey
Far be it from a CNN reporter to pass judgement on voter fraud. The guy was black, so obviously he can vote two or three times and if we don't like it we're racist. The Torch
This whole post is a hate crime!!! I'm suing Egnor for mental distress.Joey
How remarkably mean-spirited.Even if the claim that being gay was as damaging to your health and the health of those around you as being a smoker were true (I don't have that data), you'd also have to accept the premise that either people were born smokers or that being gay was a choice. I understand that a lot of your opinions are informed by your catholicism, but I'd also think that you'd have picked up some of those charitable, understanding christian traits I'm always hearing about and consider that the people you're referencing are human beings who have committed no crime, and who have certainly been and continue to be discriminated against. Or do you think that they haven't?I'm struggling to even understand the point of this image, or your support of it. I mean, I understand it as simple bigotry, but you've claimed in the past that you're not a homophobe, you just don't support gay marriage. I even remember you supporting gays opening serving in the military. So what's your justification of this?For the record, I don't think smokers should be demonised either, but I find the lack of compassion here astonishing.Nick
I believe that homosexual acts (not feelings) are sinful and self-destructive and harm society. On a practical basis, they spread disease with extraordinary effectiveness.I oppose them because I care about the lives and souls of my gay neighbors and friends. You support them because you care more about political correctness and/or your own urges than you do about the lives and souls of gay people.The analogy to smokers is quite accurate.
I find your lack of intelligence astonishing. Smoking cigarettes and smoking pole are both choices. Both are bad, unhealthy choices. but we don't call the anti-tobacco movement anti-smoker bigots. Why do we call those who object to homosexuality bigots and bullies? The Torch